A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It is actually effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may well request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
The former means “guilty act” as well as the latter means “guilty mind.” With the omission of your intention, the commission in the act by yourself isn't enough to gain a conviction for that crime. This is usually a standard principle that all legislation students are well acquainted with.
It is currently perfectly-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are thoroughly different, therefore, inside our view the acquired Judge experienced fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner because of the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
82 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
only on the ground of miscases remanded & only about the ground of misreading of evidence only on the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
6. Mere involvement in a very heinous offence is no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for that concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, because then He's behind the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is not any more necessary for further investigation, therefore, his continuous incarceration would not serve any effective purpose at this stage.
Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common law, is usually a legislation that is based on precedents, that is the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than legislation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
acquitted the appellants from all of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
Criminal cases While get more info in the common legislation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil law systems, common regulation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decreased courts should make decisions dependable with the previous decisions of higher courts.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only performed Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations as a result they were properly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.